I saw these in a post on hangingtogether, the OCLC RLG Programs blog. Both are worth a look.
1. A comparison of repository types and the affect on scholarly communication
Comparing Repository Types: Challenges and Barriers for Subject-Based Repositories, Research Repositories, National Repository Systems and Institutional Repositories in Serving Scholarly Communication by Chris Armbruster Research Network 1989 Laurent Romary INRIA November 23, 2009
Four kinds of publication repository are described: subject-based, research, national system and institutional. Two shifts in the role of repositories may be noted. For content, a well-defined and high quality corpus is essential. For service, high value to specific scholarly communities is essential.
Challenges and barriers to repository development are laid out in three dimensions:
a) identification and deposit of content
b) access and use of services
c) preservation of content and sustainability of service
2. A case-study-based look at how researchers work and how they relate to policies and services from information service providers and employers.
Patterns of information use and exchange: case studies of researchers in the life sciences: A report of research patterns in life sciences revealing that researcher practices diverge from policies promoted by funders and information service providers by the RIN and the British Library.
The report concludes that ‘one-size-ﬁts-all’ information and data sharing policies do not achieve scientiﬁcally productive and cost-efﬁcient information use in life sciences.